Testing before launch helps uncover vulnerabilities before customers or employees begin using the system. Fixes can usually be implemented faster and at a lower cost at this stage.

New features and code changes can introduce vulnerabilities into a previously secure application. Testing verifies whether the update has affected authentication, permissions, data processing or communication with other systems.

System relocation, network architecture changes or cloud migration can lead to misconfigurations and unintentionally exposed services. Testing assesses the new environment and its connections to existing infrastructure.

A new API, external integration or third-party service expands the attack surface. We assess access controls, communication security and risks arising from connections between individual systems.

AI applications, chatbots, agents and RAG systems may be vulnerable to prompt injection, data leakage or misuse of connected tools. Testing helps identify these risks before the system becomes available to users.

Device security depends on hardware, firmware, communication interfaces, applications and cloud services. Early testing makes it possible to address vulnerabilities before manufacturing or distribution begins.

Following an attack or suspicious activity, it is important to verify that the cause of the incident has been removed and that no additional attack paths remain. Testing also helps assess the effectiveness of newly introduced measures.

Security testing can identify technical weaknesses that could affect the outcome of an audit or certification. It can also provide evidence of the effectiveness of selected security controls.

Technologies, threats and attacker techniques are constantly evolving. Regular testing helps identify new vulnerabilities and confirms whether existing security controls remain effective.

Start with systems whose compromise would have the greatest impact on operations, customers or sensitive data. These are typically publicly accessible applications, APIs, cloud services, remote access points or critical internal infrastructure. If you are unsure, we can help you prioritise based on your architecture and risks.

Yes. A web or mobile application may be connected to APIs, cloud services, internal infrastructure or external systems. Testing multiple technologies together also helps identify vulnerabilities at their interfaces and potential attack paths across the entire solution.

Not always. We can test without access to the source code from the perspective of an external attacker. If you provide the code, we can better understand the application and focus on vulnerabilities that may be more difficult to uncover during standard external testing.

Yes, provided the testing can be performed safely and without creating an unreasonable operational risk. We define permitted methods, testing times, contact persons and excluded systems in advance. For sensitive technologies, we can use a test environment or limit the scope.

Some testing techniques can increase system load or trigger unusual behaviour. We therefore assess the risks in advance and adapt the testing to the sensitivity of the environment. We do not perform potentially disruptive actions without approval and use a more cautious approach for critical systems.

The duration depends on the type of technology, size and complexity of the environment, required testing depth and available documentation. A smaller test may take several days, while a more extensive project may require several weeks. We provide an accurate estimate after the initial consultation and scope definition.

The frequency depends on the level of risk, pace of change and regulatory requirements. We recommend regular testing and reassessment after a major update, architectural change, connection of a new service or security incident.

Yes. After remediation, we can verify whether the vulnerabilities have been removed correctly and whether the implemented changes have introduced any additional security risks. The retest provides an updated status for each finding.

During the initial consultation, we review the technologies, their connections, sensitive data, key risks and the desired outcome. Based on this information, we recommend a penetration test, security audit, configuration review, Red Teaming exercise or a combination of approaches.

A penetration test practically verifies whether vulnerabilities can be exploited and what impact a successful attack would have. A security audit focuses primarily on configurations, implemented controls and compliance with the requirements of a selected methodology or standard.

Red Teaming is suitable when you want to assess the resilience of the organisation as a whole rather than the security of a single technology. It simulates the methods of a real attacker and may combine digital attacks, social engineering and physical intrusion. It also assesses whether the security team can detect, stop and manage the attack.